Skip to content
Analog Intelligence
Catalog AI–ERA–001Chennai / Est. 2025

Trust infrastructurefor the AI-era internet.

We build the trust layer between people, organizations, and the internet.

Read the field note
Evidence map / 001Signal → judgement
JUDGEMENTconfidence 0.87
Human in the loopRevision 01.4
Est. 2025
Classification
Public interest

Mission

Trust is becoming infrastructure.

As the internet becomes more synthetic, people and organizations need systems that can evaluate signals before they become decisions.

Analog Intelligence builds that infrastructure: agents, evidence pipelines, watch systems, and decision layers that make internet-facing risk understandable and actionable.

Dependable judgement, built into software.

How we operate

From signal to judgement.

A message, screenshot, domain, vendor, claim, or alert is never treated as just a prompt. It becomes a case.

We structure the evidence, identify entities and claims, check sources, model risk, and return a judgement that can be explained, audited, and acted on.

The output is not content. It is operational intelligence.

01

Capture

Receive messages, links, screenshots, claims, domains, vendors, alerts, and public signals.

02

Structure

Break signals into entities, sources, claims, context, contradictions, and evidence.

03

Verify

Check credibility, provenance, consistency, public sources, and risk patterns.

04

Judge

Score what is risky, unsupported, urgent, relevant, or actionable.

05

Act

Turn findings into briefs, reports, watches, cases, alerts, or workflow actions.

System 01 / Kaval

A trust agent for the open internet.

Kaval turns messy digital signals into structured cases—then extracts entities, checks sources, models risk, preserves uncertainty, and explains the judgement in plain language.

For people, Kaval helps decide what to trust and what to avoid. For teams, the same system becomes watches, briefs, investigations, reports, and handoffs.

Open Kaval

Signal intake

Messages, links, screenshots, images, claims, domains, vendors, pages, alerts, and workspace signals.

Evidence structure

Sources, entities, claims, observations, contradictions, and context made legible.

Risk judgement

A clear view of what is risky, unsupported, urgent, relevant, or actionable.

Specialist workflows

Verification, scam risk, media analysis, source search, investigation, watch logic, and synthesis.

Memory and watches

A durable understanding of what matters, with watches for meaningful change.

Action layer

Findings become briefs, reports, cases, alerts, watches, handoffs, or workflow actions.

The interface is simple. The judgement layer underneath is not.

Research principles

How we build systems worthy of trust.

01

Sources before answers

Trust starts with where a claim came from, not how convincing it sounds.

02

Preserve uncertainty

A useful system knows the difference between evidence, inference, and absence.

03

Judgement you can defend

The path from signal to decision should remain visible, inspectable, and accountable.

04

Human in the loop

High-stakes decisions keep people in control of context, thresholds, and action.

Contact / Collaborate

Building with teams where trust is operational.

We work with select teams on digital risk, verification, investigation, watch, and trust-decision systems.